| Crudo WTI | 94.38 | +8.04% | |
| Crudo Brent | 97.40 | +6.89% | |
| Crudo Murban | 95.45 | +6.00% | |
| Gas natural | 3.197 | -2.83% |
Noticias de última hora:
La inflación de Pakistán se acelera al 11,7% en el impacto de la importación de petróleo y gas
El auge del GNL en Estados Unidos es real, pero China está planeando más allá de él
- La guerra de Irán y la interrupción de Ormuz han turboalimentado las exportaciones de GNL de Estados Unidos, dando a Washington un importante impulso de dominio de la energía a corto plazo mientras Asia y Europa luchan por un suministro alternativo.
- Sin embargo, China entra en la crisis desde una posición de mayor resiliencia energética después de años de inversión en la producción nacional.
- Estados Unidos todavía tiene una gran oportunidad a largo plazo, pero mantener el dominio requerirá convertir la demanda impulsada por la crisis en asociaciones duraderas.
La guerra de Irán ha brindado a los Estados Unidos una rara oportunidad: un nuevo amanecer de dominio energético en un mundo cada vez más fracturado. Con ataques coordinados entre Estados Unidos e Israel que interrumpen el Estrecho de Ormuz desde finales de febrero, aproximadamente el 20% del suministro mundial de GNL ha sido despojado del mercado desde principios de marzo. Los precios han aumentado en Asia y Europa. Y en ese vacío, el gas estadounidense ha fluido.
Las cifras hablan por sí solas. Las exportaciones de GNL de EE.UU. a Asia saltaron bruscamente.en abril, con casi una cuarta parte de todos los cargamentos estadounidenses que se dirigían a una región que simplemente no puede permitirse el lujo de oscurecer. Se están firmando acuerdos, se están planificando oleoductos y se están vertiendo 100 mil millones de dólares en inversión privada en plantas y terminales de licuefacción, lo que pone a Estados Unidos en una trayectoria hacia 220 MTPA de capacidad de exportación dentro de cinco años. La agenda de dominación energética de la administración, respaldada por promesas de racionalizar los permisos,Ha dado a los productores un poderoso viento de cola político y ha tranquilizado a los compradores globales que buscan fiabilidad. El caso de Washington para el GNL estadounidense nunca ha sido tan fácil de hacer.
Pero el dominio basado en una crisis no es lo mismo que el dominio basado en la confianza. Y hay un competidor observando este momento con mucho cuidado.
china entró en esta crisis en una posición estructuralmente diferente dos décadas de inversión sostenidaen la producción nacional de energía, que abarca la generación, el almacenamiento y la distribución, han dejado a Pekín considerablemente menos expuesto a los choques de suministro que azotan los mercados occidentales y asiáticos por igual. Su economía no ha sido inmune, pero ha sido amortiguada. Esa resiliencia no ha pasado desapercibida para los gobiernos que luchan por explicar el aumento de las facturas de energía a sus poblaciones. Mientras Estados Unidos capitaliza el aumento inmediato de la demanda, China está acumulando silenciosamente algo más duradero:La percepción de la previsión estratégica.
Relacionado: Los perforadores estadounidenses agregan más aparejos en respuesta a precios más altos
Yet beneath the boom lies a fault line. The conflict has been a short-term windfall for American producers; cash is flowing and the geopolitical case for US LNG writes itself. But the longer the crisis persists, the more urgently governments around the world will prioritise the same fundamental objective: never being held hostage to a single chokepoint again. The Hormuz disruption has concentrated minds in a way that years of energy dialogues have never quite managed. Countries across Asia and Europe are now accelerating plans to diversify supply sources, build strategic reserves, and develop domestic generation capacity across every available technology. The goal is insulation from the kind of shock this war has delivered, and that shift in priorities will outlast the conflict itself, because the memory of this vulnerability will not fade quickly.
This does not mean the window for American gas has closed. The transition to more resilient, independent energy systems will take decades, and reliable LNG from a powerful economy is precisely what energy-hungry Asian economies need throughout that journey. The US has the reserves, the infrastructure, the financial markets, and the geopolitical credibility that no other supplier can currently match. But Washington cannot afford to mistake a crisis-driven demand surge for a permanent structural advantage, because what buyers are ultimately building toward is a system in which no single disruption, whether in the Strait of Hormuz or anywhere else, can send their economies into shock again. The US needs to be architected into that system as an indispensable partner, not treated as an emergency option.
That requires more than competitive pricing and export capacity. It requires the kind of long-term supply relationships, infrastructure partnerships, and government-to-government commitments that turn a transaction into a dependency, the good kind, built on reliability rather than vulnerability. It requires Washington to show up as a strategic partner invested in the energy security of its buyers. And it requires the Iran conflict to reach a resolution that restores stability to global flows, because sustained disruption ultimately accelerates the very diversification strategies that could reduce the world's reliance on any single fuel source.
That is why forums like Gastech matter far beyond the conference floor. At Gastech 2025 in Milan, a high-profile US delegation led by Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum used the event to demonstrate Washington’s commitment to the global market and deepen long-term partnerships with European buyers. This September, the same strategic imperative shifts to Asia, as Gastech convenes ministers, industry CEOs, and technology leaders in Bangkok around the urgent supply security and resilience priorities now defining the global energy agenda. Bangkok demands the same level of engagement, but with even greater stakes. Positioned at the heart of the world’s fastest-growing demand region, it is where the contracts signed today will shape the architecture of energy relationships for the next decade. It is where the US can arrive not only as the world’s largest LNG exporter, but as the partner that helped Asia build the resilient, diversified, and secure energy systems its economies need, with American technology, American capital, and American gas at the centre of that architecture.
The use of energy as a diplomatic instrument, as a foundation for alliances and a signal of long-term intent, has already demonstrated its capacity to stabilise relationships and strengthen the position of reliable partners. But leverage only holds if buyers believe the relationship will endure beyond the current emergency. And that is ultimately what is being decided right now: whether the world organises its energy future around American reliability, or looks elsewhere for the security guarantees it needs.
American energy dominance is real, and the Iran war has made that case powerfully. But dominance has to be earned continuously, through the infrastructure being built, the contracts being signed, and the diplomatic relationships being deepened, conference room by conference room, deal by deal. The window is open. What matters now is how Washington chooses to use it.
By Cyril Widderhoven for Oilprice.com

