Trump tuitea que ni conoce a Putin ni tiene pacto con Rusia

Trump: "No conozco a Putin ni tengo pactos con Rusia"

Publicado: 7 feb 2017 12:16 GMT | Última actualización: 7 feb 2017 12:57 GMT

El presidente de EE.UU. ha publicado un tuit en donde afirma no tener ninguna relación con su homólogo ruso ni con su país.

"No conozco a Putin ni tengo pactos con Rusia, y los odiadores se vuelven locos – ¡y en cambio Obama puede firmar un acuerdo con Irán, país número uno en terrorismo, con eso no hay problema!", ha afirmado el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, en un tuit publicado este martes.

Durante la campaña electoral, el magnate fue acusado en varias ocasiones de tener oscuras relaciones con Rusia y hasta de haber tenido la ayuda de presuntos 'hackers' rusos para ganar en las presidenciales, aunque ninguna de estas acusaciones fueron acompañadas nunca con pruebas.

Después de su victoria, opositores de Trump difundieron informaciones que indicaban que Moscú disponía presuntamente de materiales comprometedores sobre el nuevo inquilino de la Casa Blanca, quien desde el principio de la carrera electoral ha prometido mejorar las relaciones bilaterales entre Washington y Moscú. Esta afirmación en contra del magnate tampoco fue demostrada, y fue desmentida enérgicamente tanto por Trump como por el Kremlin.

 Читать

Donald J. Trump 

✔@realDonaldTrump

I don't know Putin, have no deals in Russia, and the haters are going crazy - yet Obama can make a deal with Iran, #1 in terror, no problem!

08:11 - 7 февраля 2017

 
•  8 4128 412 Ретвитов
 
•  27 96727 967 отметок «Нравится»

Más información en breve  Etiquetas:PutinTrumpTwitter https://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/230463-trump-ningunos-pactos-putin

Jimmy Carter pide a Obama que reconozca al Estado de Palestina antes de concluir su mandato. https://t.co/rgbpJQU6vn pic.twitter.com/unUoi7g9No

— Orlando Jorge Mera (@orlandojm) 29 de noviembre de 2016

The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine

By JIMMY CARTERNOV. 28, 2016

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page

• 
  

Photo

Credithttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/28/opinion/jimmy-carter-america-must-recognize-palestine.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

HOMESEARCHSKIP TO CONTENTSKIP TO NAVIGATIONVIEW MOBILE VERSION
The Opinion Pages|Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine
ATLANTA — We do not yet know the policy of the next administration toward Israel and Palestine, but we do know the policy of this administration. It has been President Obama’s aim to support a negotiated end to the conflict based on two states, living side by side in peace.
That prospect is now in grave doubt. I am convinced that the United States can still shape the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict before a change in presidents, but time is very short. The simple but vital step this administration must take before its term expires on Jan. 20 is to grant American diplomatic recognition to the state of Palestine, as 137 countries have already done, and help it achieve full United Nations membership.
Back in 1978, during my administration, Israel’s prime minister, Menachem Begin, and Egypt’s president, Anwar Sadat, signed the Camp David Accords. That agreement was based on the United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, which was passed in the aftermath of the 1967 war. The key words of that resolution were “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East in which every state in the area can live in security,” and the “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.”
From left, President Anwar Sadat of Egypt, Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel and President Jimmy Carter of the United States in 1978 during the White House announcement of a Middle East peace agreement reached at Camp David. Credit Associated Press
The agreement was ratified overwhelmingly by the Parliaments of Egypt and Israel. And those two foundational concepts have been the basis for the policy of the United States government and the international community ever since.
This was why, in 2009, at the beginning of his first administration, Mr. Obama reaffirmed the crucial elements of the Camp David agreement and Resolution 242 by calling for a complete freeze on the building of settlements, constructed illegally by Israel on Palestinian territory. Later, in 2011, the president made clear that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines,” and added, “negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine.”
Today, however, 38 years after Camp David, the commitment to peace is in danger of abrogation. Israel is building more and more settlements, displacing Palestinians and entrenching its occupation of Palestinian lands. Over 4.5 million Palestinians live in these occupied territories, but are not citizens of Israel. Most live largely under Israeli military rule, and do not vote in Israel’s national elections.
Meanwhile, about 600,000 Israeli settlers in Palestine enjoy the benefits of Israeli citizenship and laws. This process is hastening a one-state reality that could destroy Israeli democracy and will result in intensifying international condemnation of Israel.
The Carter Center has continued to support a two-state solution by hosting discussions this month with Israeli and Palestinian representatives, searching for an avenue toward peace. Based on the positive feedback from those talks, I am certain that United States recognition of a Palestinian state would make it easier for other countries that have not recognized Palestine to do so, and would clear the way for a Security Council resolution on the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Security Council should pass a resolution laying out the parameters for resolving the conflict. It should reaffirm the illegality of all Israeli settlements beyond the 1967 borders, while leaving open the possibility that the parties could negotiate modifications. Security guarantees for both Israel and Palestine are imperative, and the resolution must acknowledge the right of both the states of Israel and Palestine to live in peace and security. Further measures should include the demilitarization of the Palestinian state, and a possible peacekeeping force under the auspices of the United Nations.
A strong Security Council resolution would underscore that the Geneva Conventions and other human rights protections apply to all parties at all times. It would also support any agreement reached by the parties regarding Palestinian refugees.
The combined weight of United States recognition, United Nations membership and a Security Council resolution solidly grounded in international law would lay the foundation for future diplomacy. These steps would bolster moderate Palestinian leadership, while sending a clear assurance to the Israeli public of the worldwide recognition of Israel and its security.
This is the best — now, perhaps, the only — means of countering the one-state reality that Israel is imposing on itself and the Palestinian people. Recognition of Palestine and a new Security Council resolution are not radical new measures, but a natural outgrowth of America’s support for a two-state solution.
The primary foreign policy goal of my life has been to help bring peace to Israel and its neighbors. That September in 1978, I was proud to say to a joint session of Congress, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.” As Mr. Begin and Mr. Sadat sat in the balcony above us, the members of Congress stood and applauded the two heroic peacemakers.
I fear for the spirit of Camp David. We must not squander this chance.
Jimmy Carter, the founder of the Carter Center, was the 39th president of the United States.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/28/opinion/jimmy-carter-america-must-recognize-palestine.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

Investigan el alto número de casos de cáncer en Guantánamo

lainformacion.com Miércoles, 29 de julio del 2015 - 09:54

[ 0 ]

• La marina de EEUU está investigando el alto número de casos de cáncer registrados en la Bahía de Guantanamo.
• Una denuncia hecha por trabajadores afectados pide que se evacúen de la zona a abogados civiles y militares.

 

El Campo X-Ray, el escenario más negro de Guantánamo

La marina de EEUU está investigando el elevado número de casos de cáncer que se han registrado en los últimos años en la Bahía de Guantánamo, Cuba.

Una queja presentada ante el organismo militar ha pedido que se evacúen a todos los abogados civiles y militares que trabajan en la cárcel y base de EEUU en la isla, debido al alto número de casos de cáncer que se han registrado entre los trabajadores que acuden  a la base para participar en juicios. 

Al menos siete personas, civiles y miembros del ejército, que han trabajado en juicios en el centro de detención han sido diagnosticados de cáncer, según la queja, que fue presentada ante la Oficina del Departamento de Defensa del Inspector General. Tres de estos abogados han muerto.

La queja presentada exige que se hagan pruebas de presencia de cancerígenos en la zona. En los últimos 10 años han sido cerca de 200 personas las que han acudido a la base a trabajar en juicios. 

Según la denuncia presentada, el alto número de casos de cáncer no se registra entre los detenidos en la base.

http://noticias.lainformacion.com/mundo/investigan-el-alto-numero-de-casos-de-cancer-en-guantanamo_dlPzf36nnXcLcAFSQAOwT3/